Welcome to HPMug2oMmNrOfxWQHLiEksa6s0hFu9Ox348d7QefarYlaFR5ArkhOwm3Da1pmxmxCtenj1+6luWD#r#n+EPn9L6Ce+9onqnMlT+i! Today is

HPMug2oMmNrOfxWQHLiEksa6s0hFu9Ox348d7QefarYlaFR5ArkhOwm3Da1pmxmxCtenj1+6luWD#r#n+EPn9L6Ce+9onqnMlT+i ›› 2010, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 75-78.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0479.2010.04.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

AnAnalysisofSomeRestrictiveFactorsforRegisterProtectionofUrbanCulturalHeritages

  

  1. 1.SchoolofEcotourism,SouthwestForestryUniversity,Kunming650224,China;
    2.SchoolofPoliticalScienceandLaw,DaliUniversity,DaliYunnan671000,China
  • Online:2010-07-30 Published:2010-07-30

Abstract: Registerprotectioncouldbeappliedasabeneficialsupplementtoexistingappointmentprotec tionandwouldpreventsomeurbanculturalheritageswhicharen’tappointedfromdestroying.However, manyrestrictivefactorsexistinapplyingregisterprotectionsystemasfollows:economy,fundshortageof preservationofculturalrelics;alowurbanizationlevel;imperfectlegalsystemconstruction;weakcon sciousnessofparticipation;lackofconservationstandardsetc.Therefore,weshouldconsiderthediffer entbackgroundbetweencountriesandavoidtakeinall.

Key words: urbanculturalheritages, registerprotection, restrictivefactors

CLC Number: