欢迎访问《昆明冶金职业大学学报》,

昆明冶金职业大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 29-.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4979.2026.01.004

• 资源开发与测绘 • 上一篇    下一篇

某矿大采高上行开采顶板巷道位置选择分析

  

  1. 昆明冶金高等专科学校 a.冶金与矿业学院;b.高等职业教育研究院; c.环境与化工学院;d.教务处;e.发展规划处,云南 昆明 65003
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-13 出版日期:2026-02-11 发布日期:2026-06-03
  • 基金资助:
    昆明冶金高等专科学校科研基金项目 “深部损伤岩体卸荷数值模拟研究” (2020XJZK04);云南省教育厅科 学研究基金项目 “损伤岩体卸荷裂隙扩展规律多尺度分形分析研究”(2019J0891)。

Analysis on Location Selection of Roof Roadway for Upward Miningin Large Mining Height Mine

  1. a. Faculty of Metallurgy and Mining; b. Institute of Higher Vocational Education;c. Faculty of Environmental and Chemical Engineering; d. Academic Affairs Office; e. Division ofDevelopment and Planning, Kunming Metallurgy College, Kunming 650033, China
  • Received:2024-12-13 Online:2026-02-11 Published:2026-06-03

摘要: 本文以某矿山 8煤北翼皮带运输大巷为研究背景,利用关键层理论重点研究上行开采上覆岩层关键层 破断距和三带高度,运用 FLAC3D数值模拟软件分析不同采高上覆岩层运移规律,通过正交试验优化巷道位置 选择,最终得到以下结论:1)不同采高由于受到关键层的影响,裂隙带高度随采高增大呈突变式上升,每次突 变表示有一层关键层破断形成砌体梁结构。2)工作面塑性区呈两端高、中间低的 “马鞍形”分布,随着采高的 增大,开采边界上方塑性区范围与中部塑性区范围差值减小。随着采高的增加,超前应力集中系数和侧向应力 集中系数呈线性增长,峰值位置随着采高的增大而增大。3)影响因子权重由大到小依次为法距、平距和采高。 在采高 2m,法向距离采场 140m,平向距离超过采场边界 20m的位置布置巷道最为合适;法向距离采场 60m, 平距 20~40m的位置为应力增高区域,不宜在此区域布置巷道。

关键词: 上行开采, 巷道位置选择, 关键层, 大采高, “三带”高度

Abstract: This study takes the north-wing belt transportation roadway of No. 8 coal mine as the engineer-ing context. The key stratum theory is applied to determine the fracture spacing of overlying strata and theheights of the three zonesin upward mining. FLAC3D numerical simulation software is used to analyze themovement law of overlying strata at different mining heights. Orthogonal experiments are conducted to op-limize roadway location selection. The following conclusions are drawn: 1) Due to the influence of keylayers, the height of the fracture zone increases abruptly with the increase of mining height. Each abruptinerease indicates that a key stratum has fractured and formed a voussoir beam structure. 2) The plasticzone of the working face exhibits a saddle-shape distribution (high at both ends and low in the middle).As mining height increases, the difference between the plastic zone above the mining boundary and thatin the middle decreases. The advance stress concentration coefficient and lateral stress concentration coef-ficient increase linearly with mining height, and their peak positions move farther away. 3) The influencing factors, in descending order of weight, are normal distance, horizontal distance, and mining height.The optimal roadway location is at a mining height of 2 meters, with a normal distance of 140 meters fromthe mining face and a horizontal distance exceeding 20 meters from the mining site boundary. Anormaldistance of 60 meters and a horizontal distance of 20 ~ 40 meters define a stress concentration zone,which is unsuitable for roadway placement.

Key words: upstream mining, roadway location selection, key stratum, large mining height, heights of
the three zones