Welcome to HPMug2oMmNrOfxWQHLiEksa6s0hFu9Ox348d7QefarYlaFR5ArkhOwm3Da1pmxmxCtenj1+6luWD#r#n+EPn9L6Ce+9onqnMlT+i! Today is

HPMug2oMmNrOfxWQHLiEksa6s0hFu9Ox348d7QefarYlaFR5ArkhOwm3Da1pmxmxCtenj1+6luWD#r#n+EPn9L6Ce+9onqnMlT+i ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 110-.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0479.2022.01.020

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Quantitative Research on the Grading Scaling Mechanism for Students from Disadvantaged Backgrounds in Colleges

WU Weia,DONG Xub,YANG Jiec,REN Zhuojunc,DONG Juand,YIN Qionga   

  1. (a. Faculty of Metallurgy and Mine; b. Faculty of Business; c. Human Resources Division; d. Faculty of Computer Information,Metallurgy and Mining Engineering, Kunming Metallurgy College, Kunming 650033 , China)
  • Received:2021-08-21 Online:2022-02-14 Published:2023-12-04

Abstract:

It has always been an important task for colleges and universities to provide financial aid tostudents from disadvantaged backgrounds. However, the current grading recognition criteria are still qualitative-based, so grading results vary among different evaluators, and there are often some deviations inthe grading results. In order to reduce the deviations , this paper introduces the analytic hierarchy process( AHP) to determine the target level, benchmark level and scheme level. Then, pairwise comparison isused to analyze the relationship between the factors, and the values of each control factor calculated. Fi-nally , a grading mechanism of recognizing students from disadvantaged backgrounds is built, which con·sidering both objective and subjective factors in the recognition process. The two-state (0, 1) is used toassign values to the variables in the model. The scores for each student can be quickly calculated and thegrading scale intuitively sorted based on quantitative evaluation , which is different from the previous qual.itative evaluation mechanisms. Therefore, it is effective and feasible to apply the AHP method to gradecollege students from disadvantaged backgrounds. It can greatly improve the validity and reliability of thegrading recognition mechanism.

Key words: colleges and universities, analytic hierarchy process ( AHP);students from disadvantaged backgrounds, grading scale, quantification

CLC Number: