欢迎访问昆明冶金高等专科学校学报官方网站,今天是 分享到:

昆明冶金高等专科学校学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 57-62.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0479.2014.04.014

• 经济与企业管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

施工招投标采购中2种定价模式对比研究

张 锋   

  1. 昆明冶金高等专科学校建工学院,云南昆明650033
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-21 出版日期:2014-08-31 发布日期:2014-08-31
  • 作者简介:张锋(1975-),男(白族),云南大理人,讲师,管理科学与工程(项目管理方向) 硕士,主要从事项目管理知识体系、项目管理知识管理、项目经理职业能力及工程项目管理工作。

Comparative Study on Two Kinds of Pricing Mode of Construction Bidding Procurement

ZHANG   Feng   

  1. Faculty of Architecture Engineering, Kunming Metallurgy College, Kunming 650033,China
  • Received:2014-05-21 Online:2014-08-31 Published:2014-08-31

摘要:         对建设工程项目合理定价是建设工程项目成本目标控制的关键因素,也是我国建设工程项目管理体制改革的核心内容之一。从项目管理的系统性角度对比分析定额计价模式和工程量清单计价模式之间的区别,揭示二者在实施的原理、采购的本质目的、评标方法和原则3个方面的区别,并对比分析结果,提供了从“大局图”的角度理解工程量清单招投标模式的新思维,以有效地采用工程量清单进行采购,从而提高建设工程项目管理的效率。

关键词: 工程量清单计价, 招投标, 定额计价, 工程项目采购管理

Abstract: Reasonable pricing of Construction projects in project procurement management is a key factor for cost controlling, and is one of the core contents of China′s construction engineering project management system reform. The difference between the fixed pricing model and BOQ was analyzed by using the system of project management. The differences of implementation principle, procurement purpose,and Method of Evaluation of Bid between two modes have been reported.The results provide a new thinking of engineering quantity understanding from the “overall situation” point for bidding mode; promote the efficient use of engineering quantity list to purchase, so as to improve the efficiency of the management of construction projects.

Key words: BOQ pricing, tendering and bidding, fixed quotapricing, project procurement managemen

中图分类号: